Bayer-Monsanto

A Poisonous Vision

a field of corn dpadistorted
How green was my valley - and what would the merger mean?
  • Why it matters

    Why it matters

    The author argues that the agro-industry’s vision is out of step with ecology and human health, and its business model ignores the needs of future consumers at its own risk.

  • Facts

    Facts

    • Studies show the growing world population can be fed with organic agriculture.
    • Bayer is to finance the takeover with loans and bond issues, which will hit its equity capital ratio and leave the company less financial leeway for innovation.
    • Bayer-Monsanto isn’t taking future agricultural reform into account, risking a fate similar to energy companies now hit by the energy transition.
  • Audio

    Audio

  • Pdf

Corporate bosses Werner Baumann of Bayer and Hugh Grant of Monsanto have a vision. They want to be innovation drivers for agriculture, feed the world’s population and achieve enormous growth.

In this vision, diverse, living Earth is reduced to industrial space, where genetically manipulated plants, chemical fertilizers and so-called crop protection products maximize profitable biomass. All plants and organisms perish except genetically manipulated agricultural crops. Farmers become de facto dependent workers whose function is to supervise the spreading of substances delivered by the chemical industry and the harvesting of biomass produced via fully automatic, digitally controlled heavy machinery.

The long-term consequences are infertile soil and contaminated groundwater. It means massive destruction of nature’s value for the sake of the capital value of just a few companies. It can also be expected to destroy diverse rural cultures and vibrant cultural landscapes worldwide.

Want to keep reading?

Subscribe now or log in to read our coverage of Europe’s leading economy.